PART 2: WHAT IS TRUE REALITY? WHAT REALITY IS NOT

Illness Is Evidence of Unreality

“He [god of sickness] is the belief that you can choose which god is real. Although it is clear this has nothing to do with reality, it is equally clear that it has everything to do with reality as you perceive it.” (ACIM, T-10.III.11)

A Course in Miracles sees sickness as unreal, as an illusion, as evidence that we are not “in reality.” Most importantly, ACIM does not “blame the victim,” though. We are to have compassion for ourselves as well as others when we or they are under the weather. If we can just see this evidence of illusion as illusion, we will not be so likely to exacerbate pain into suffering.

Not all of us can avoid this exacerbation all the time. Doing so is the “ideal” reading of A Course in Miracles, and on the practical level, we see plenty of evidence that many of us do get sick, and on a regular basis. In addition, sainthood is no preserver of good health. We see no evidence in ACIM that those who are “closer” to God have an immunity from the ills of the human condition.

Knowing that even good people have illnesses can help us to see that we are in no position to blame the victim. We can’t see the whole picture; that is because of our finite minds. The Christ Self within each of us is not omniscient. The Christ Self is just following true reality as far as this Self can muster.

So, seeing illnesses as unreal, as lacking true reality, means that our real Self has not suffered. Nothing awry has gone wrong with the inner Self. We are still safe. But, as long as live on earth, we will be subject to its ills. And we need compassion to get us through the rough spots.

Don’t be tempted to blame the victim, because we “create our own reality,” as is said in New Age circles. This type of mentality avoids the hard issues of suffering that nobody has an answer for. The best we can do is simply to see this suffering as not touching the real Self. The illusory “little” self can get into all kinds of trouble, though. And when this happens (and it will happen, inevitably, to many of us) we need to ask for the patience to endure, and, most importantly, not to be tempted to turn our pains into suffering. To do so adds an emotional component to the pain that can be avoided, and ought to be, whenever we can muster the impetus to avoid this emotional component.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “PART 2: WHAT IS TRUE REALITY? WHAT REALITY IS NOT

  1. Hi celia, I do not quite follow: “The Christ Self within each of us is not omniscient. The Christ Self is just following true reality as far as this Self can muster.” Would you explain in ACOL terms? many thanks Ben

    1. Ben —

      I was thinking of what I have noticed as a contrast between the way that A Course in Miracles discusses the Christ, and the way that A Course of Love discusses the Self. In the ACIM Workbook, there is an essay that features the Christ as the Whole, the omniscient Being that is the All, a part of God that is omniscient. But in ACOL, we are constantly being apprised of our Christ Self, the Self that we will be when we have attained Christ-consciousness. It is my own interpretation to say that this Self is not omniscient (all-knowing), but I think it is self-evident. Minds and hearts in individual people are not omniscient, as we believe God is, for example. We still, even though embodying the Christ Self and having attained Christ-consciousness, don’t know the All except in mystical glimpses.

      Do you agree? I would welcome a dialogue.

      Thanks for writing in.

      Celia

      1. Hi Celia…”It is my own interpretation to say that this Self is not omniscient (all-knowing), but I think it is self-evident. Minds and hearts in individual people are not omniscient, as we believe God is, for example. We still, even though embodying the Christ Self and having attained Christ-consciousness, don’t know the All except in mystical glimpses. etc”….self-evident ? That depends entirely on our “interpretation” of the Self. Just as God cannot be interpreted, so cannot the SElf be explained. Just as any Beloved cannot be explained, or the scent of a rose! There is surely a relationship between the hearts and minds of individual people and the SELF, but such relationship is one of degrees. If it is the SELF we share ( as in ” The Self from which I call to you, is but your own (Review V )”, then it is that Self Who is omniscient!
        We, as individuals are catching up with that by expanding our Christ consciousness….the Prodigal will always be the father’s son!. Words…words…words. I am drafting an e-book on the SELF…totally crazy, I know, but there we are, Ultimately, as omniscient as the Self. Namaste!

      2. The interpretation of the Self that you give is also the interpretation of the Christ in A Course in Miracles. Yes, I am can see that the Self, in the All, would be omniscient.

        Thank you.

        Celia

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s